From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: [bug] Gnus author in capture templates not working Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:02:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87y6ato8bj.fsf@mundaneum.com> References: <87y6bbj3wb.fsf@mundaneum.com> <877hivje71.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87wrqvjcgy.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87sk1ex63u.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <874odrl4tz.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87wrqhfkkw.fsf@gnu.org> <871v8oyh6s.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87zkvaqfvj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > S=C3=A9bastien Vauban writes: > >> Though I had something in mind, that's effectively not expressed above: = I'd >> like to get that date in the Org format, so that I can use it as a proper >> Org timestamp in entries: >> >> * TODO Answer mail of Bastien >> [2010-09-20 Mon 00:13] >> >> Would that request be feasible and accepted by you? > > You can now use %:org-date for Gnus links on messages. Slight difference > with your proposal, the output is of the form: > > <2010-09-20 Mon 00:13> Didn't think of the active version. But is it too much asking for the versi= on I searched for? Could we name it differently maybe? Or do you consider that too much of a mess, and useless? I let you decide. But I would personally consider both as useful, in fact. Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode