From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:15:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87y66jz3q4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsr9wrd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57578 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PevVe-0002UJ-0R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:17:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PevVc-00085k-5J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:17:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f195.google.com ([74.125.82.195]:65445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PevVb-00085P-Gq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:17:00 -0500 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1568133wyg.6 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:16:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fwsr9wrd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:05:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >> Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain >> simple and colorful. > > Please do not use fixed measures in pixels, points, inches or > centimeters and prescribed font families. Let this choice reside with > the user, they know what fonts in which sizes are readable on their > computer. Relative font sizes with a 1.2 scaling factor or the symbolic > fontsizes specified by CSS are more friendly. I'm by no mean a CSS expert but I agree accessibility should be on top of our priorities -- please send patches (or fixed/updated) css if you can spot at errors that we made! Thanks, -- Bastien