From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:22:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5wemt4h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <30891.1319141196@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87fwinifqu.fsf@gmail.com> <32184.1319143892@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <808vofwf1w.fsf@somewhere.org> <87y5wfgwn7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHE8o-00074Y-Fp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHE8m-0001oP-KW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:44521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHE8m-0001oK-EV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:00 -0400 Received: by wyg34 with SMTP id 34so4667339wyg.0 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:23:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5wfgwn7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:50:52 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Sebastien Vauban , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Eric Schulte writes: > There are currently a number of instances of synonymous keywords when > dealing with code blocks, specifically. > > named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function" > calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob" > named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data" > - Cases [1] and [2] : I'd suggest to drop all of them and to use "name", shared by both source code and data. Is it really different to name a source block or a list? - Case [3] : I like "call". "lob" is too cryptic. > Are there cases where we want to continue to allow synonyms (e.g., in > named data so that "results" can be used for code block results but > "data" can be used for hand-written data)? No. One Keyword to name them all. Regards, [1] DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 1 [2] DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 3 [3] DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 2 -- Nicolas Goaziou