From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:07:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5wah1hv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <30891.1319141196@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87fwinifqu.fsf@gmail.com> <32184.1319143892@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87zkgvgxe7.fsf@gmail.com> <1405.1319147324@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87zkgvfhra.fsf@gmail.com> <2127.1319148505@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87vcrjfgt1.fsf@gmail.com> <80sjmmvm60.fsf@somewhere.org> <4EA129DB.4070006@christianmoe.com> <8762ji5jr6.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwil10o2.fsf@gmail.com> <4EA31457.3090800@christianmoe.com> <4EA54DF9.40307@christianmoe.com> <808voaoagv.fsf@somewhere.org> <4EA55C5A.9080006@christianmoe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIM8v-0004Xt-BY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:08:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIM8t-0007Xt-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:08:49 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:62569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIM8t-0007Um-0H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:08:47 -0400 Received: by wwe32 with SMTP id 32so3874353wwe.0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:08:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EA55C5A.9080006@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:38:50 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: mail@christianmoe.com Cc: Sebastien Vauban , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Christian Moe writes: > But you're right, property inheritance is not on by default and > I forgot to mention that this time around. (I think I did mention it > in the previous long message where I presented the idea.) AFAIK, Babel has always searched its properties with inheritance on, independently on user configuration. Thus, it doesn't matter much in that case. Regard, -- Nicolas Goaziou