From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: About commit named "Allow multi-line properties to be specified in property blocks" Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:01:37 -0700 Message-ID: <87y5vqeh47.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87vcr5c76e.fsf@gmail.com> <87vcr5j5a5.fsf@gmail.com> <4EAF118C.8050806@christianmoe.com> <87hb2mo7ek.fsf@altern.org> <87obwuh19t.fsf@gmail.com> <87hb2mdmi9.fsf@gnu.org> <87obwtgip9.fsf@gmail.com> <87sjm5ez0f.fsf@gmail.com> <804nyfne7b.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNnDI-0002uf-7v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:03:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNnDC-0004gy-Ak for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:03:48 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]:56208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNnDC-0004fx-65 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:03:42 -0500 Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so1690155pzk.6 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:03:41 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rainer M Krug Cc: Sebastien Vauban , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> >> How do you unset a var? By resetting the list with a new var >>(without `+'), See, the example in my original email, a property with var (no "+") wipes out any previously existing var properties. >> >> and adding all the other valid vars? If so, not really >> unsetting... You simply void all vars, and create new definitions... >> yes >> > > Exactly - with "unseting" var, I don't refer to unsetting a single > variable, but all variables. > > But as we have the var+, what about a var- to unset a single variable? > This is not possible. Up until this point we continue to treat the var property as any other property, and we just allow the construction of a long var value, such as "foo=1, bar=2, baz=3". Introducing a var- would be a large departure from current property handling and would require parsing lines like the above. Best -- Eric > > >> >> Best regards, >> Seb >> >> -- >> Sebastien Vauban >> >> >> -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/