From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Maus Subject: Re: Possible bug in parsing / clarification of syntax Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:40:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87y5qxn6yt.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> References: <4F53DEF7.8080604@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Mar_18_18:40:07_2012-1"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9K5Y-00024d-7N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:40:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9K5W-0003Zi-Al for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:40:15 -0400 Received: from app1a.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.161]:46661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S9K5W-0003ZR-4m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:40:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F53DEF7.8080604@gmx.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Simon Thum Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Mar_18_18:40:07_2012-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hi Simon, At Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:30:31 +0100, Simon Thum wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have found some irritating behaviour, potentially a bug. I have a > block agenda which goes like: > > tags-todo "@home&TODO=\"TODO\" > > and it displays a certain org line that reads > > **** TODO_ state triggers > > Which is just a heading for dealing with TODO state triggers, and I > appended the _ as I don't want it to be a TODO. > > For example, the global TODO list and syntax highlighting does not > consider it a todo, but C-c a m TODO="TODO" does. TODO="T" does not, > so it's not very grave. > > Most likely, it's simply an inconsistency arising from not having a > real parser. I just wanted to report it here so it may get fixed. Thanks for the report. It was indeed a glitch and it should be fixed by now in current master. Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de --pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Mar_18_18:40:07_2012-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk9mHfcACgkQDMLgk1Evc4UlegEAn2xMe4OdgcVWOtB/UOrg0NUj /O3kQdQrGXi2c4Nv/s8A/1fajqW2hCOjIl4Lirtb4A19hRxKxPKOmLoA1DZXA7vt =akiw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Mar_18_18:40:07_2012-1--