From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Org/LaTeX set-up for business letters? Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:58:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5mvaild.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <8762a2l6f7.fsf@googlemail.com> <87mx3ejan4.fsf@googlemail.com> <87ipe1keow.fsf@googlemail.com> <20120707015505.GA10846@panahar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTc7-00053x-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:55:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTc2-00017I-VD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:55:50 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTc2-00017B-Fn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:55:46 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SnTc0-0002iD-7K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:55:44 +0200 Received: from g231235015.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.235.15]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:55:44 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by g231235015.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:55:44 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Vikas Rawal writes: >> > >> > [1] Off the top of the head I recall a package called `scrlttr'. >> >> Yes, part of KOMA (?), but thats rather low level if you have to design >> your own letters - and who knows all that stuff about professional letter >> design?. I tried that once and the result was ugly, there is a lot of >> extra work necesary to make it look fancy and modern. > > May be relevant to look at this thread from the list: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/29926 So package 'isodoc' seems to be another (maybe simpler?) option. However, the thread proves again that it is not trivial to do-it-yourself. but there are quite a lot of options, it seems. -- cheers, Thorsten