From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Problem with commented LaTeX header lines Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:50:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5lx6v4i.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <8739458wr1.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87a9ydpbh6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48885) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwzZF-0001f7-Bg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:52:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwzZE-0003go-6H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:52:13 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwzZD-0003gM-VR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:52:12 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SwzZ7-0002WU-JV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:52:05 +0200 Received: from vpn-2070.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:52:05 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2070.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:52:05 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, thanks for looking into this! > > Please always tell what exporter you are using. > I did mention this: > > Test with new exporter - no cmbright: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I am sorry, if this was not explicit enough. (Is "new exporter" the correct name?) > Your example works with the default LaTeX exporter. > > With the new exporter, you don't get \usepackage{cmbright} because > you explicitely asked not to export this subtree with :noexport:. > I do not agree, because it works as expected, if I remove the comment sign: ,---- | #+TITLE: Commented LaTeX headers | | | * Try to export this subtree | With some text. | | And a second paragraph. | | | ** And a section | With some text. | | * Options :noexport: | ** LaTeX Options | #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{hyperref} | #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{tikz} | #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{cmbright} `---- > To me the new exporter is right here. To me loosing that possibility would be hard, as my latex_header sections tend to grow really long, so that I would not be happy to move them to the top. This has always been one of the really nice things in my opinion, that I can hide all this technical information in a non-exported subtree. Regards, Andreas