From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: new exporter and latex attributes
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:54:25 +0200
Message-ID: <87y5l9cgym.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20120820212833.GB66157@BigDog.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55307)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1T3avL-0008ME-Tq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:58:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1T3avK-0006cf-Oh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:58:19 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:57236)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1T3avK-0006cZ-IT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:58:18 -0400
Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so4785057wey.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120820212833.GB66157@BigDog.local> (Rick Frankel's message of
	"Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:28:33 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com> writes:

> Has the syntax for latex attributes changed in the new exporter, or is
> is the following a bug?

Neither. Though, at some point, I'd like to change syntax for LaTeX
attributes for a plist-based one.

> Given this source file:
>
> * Test width attribute
> #+ATTR_LATEX: width=3in
> #+begin_src dot :file t.png 
>   digraph g { a -> b }
> #+end_src
>
> #+results: [[file:t.png]]
>
> The old exporter generats:
> #+begin_src latex
>   \includegraphics[width=3in]{t.png}
> #+end_src
>
> And the new exporter
> #+begin_src latex
>   \includegraphics[width=.9\linewidth]{t.png}
> #+end_src
>
> which ignores the width override.

"width" is an attribute for the file, but it means nothing for the
source code.

Use something like the following.

* Test width attribute
#+NAME: graph
#+begin_src dot :file t.png 
  digraph g { a -> b }
#+end_src

#+ATTR_LATEX: width=3in
#+RESULTS: graph
[[file:t.png]]


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou