From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarmo Hurri Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lookup functions, take two Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:13:29 +0300 Message-ID: <87y5jyrb86.fsf@syk.fi> References: <87y5k0g3qc.fsf@syk.fi> <878vbzo6yu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fw67s4uu.fsf@syk.fi> <87r4pqzxab.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGMWi-0003nQ-Aq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:13:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGMWh-00083l-ES for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:13:40 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGMWh-00083a-7g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:13:39 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGMWj-0002Ol-VC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:13:41 +0200 Received: from cs181237063.pp.htv.fi ([82.181.237.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:13:41 +0200 Received: from jarmo.hurri by cs181237063.pp.htv.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 06:13:41 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > It is a nice spreadsheet utility function but my feeling is that > having it in Org's core does not really fit, as it introduces > functions where we usually have references. Functions are fine for > users to add, though, that's the whole point of allowing Elisp in > table formulas. So if it does not fit the core, where should I add it so that the users will still find it? I think that in general it is a very good idea to have powerful tables in org. Right? Many users in the land of spreadsheet programs have gotten used to these functions. You have had at least one explicit request for this feature: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-07/msg01227.html -- Jarmo