From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smart inference of task progress when exporting to TJ3 Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 12:57:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5br5a7l.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <0LlWCR-1TzVer28MZ-00b7Lb@smtp.web.de> <87r4hobgna.fsf@tanger.home> <51839ED3.6070609@web.de> <87fvy4t81g.fsf@sbs.ch> <87obcn83j3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZfaG-0001OF-VI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 06:57:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZfaE-0001uo-BW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 06:57:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]:51669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZfaE-0001ue-1L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 06:57:22 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y10so3701971wgg.0 for ; Tue, 07 May 2013 03:57:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87obcn83j3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Tue, 07 May 2013 12:08:14 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christian Egli Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > The rationale for moving some files out of core is not only about the > size of the user-base (which is very difficult to know), but mostly > about whether those contributed packages depend on 3rd-part softwares. PS: Also see this recent message by Glenn: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/159305 I think code for mailers that don't come with Emacs doesn't belong in Emacs. This is the reasoning I also tried to apply when deciding about whether a package should go into core or contrib. -- Bastien