From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Rogers Subject: Re: Adding support for limits and exclusions to iCal recurring events Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: <87y58vbywg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ehbaxt33.fsf@toke.dk> <87d2qa6cnh.fsf@gmail.com> <87y58yprs6.fsf@toke.dk> <87ip005p5b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47703) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V23iW-0004wH-MO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:23:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V23iV-0004WO-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:23:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]:40905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V23iV-0004VX-34 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:23:15 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj3so982667pad.28 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackbox ([75.157.19.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qu10sm49281146pbb.12.2013.07.24.11.23.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:23:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ip005p5b.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:38:08 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I'm clearly no Agenda specialist. I thought a DEADLINE would end > a repeated event already. If it's not the case, does it make sense to > implement it too? I consider DEADLINE, in our context, to mean "when my finished work will be needed", and therefore "when to start bothering me about getting it done". I think that was the intention when this system was set up; in other words, I think DEADLINE is treated as simply a personal warning system, and it doesn't have the power to modify the agenda like TODO vs DONE. -- David R