Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Jarmo Hurri writes: > >>>> While taking my first long tour in the land of Babel, I bumped into a >>>> minor hline issue. Can someone tell me why the hline has disappeared >>>> from the second table? >>> >>> Because you use CALL without arguments and argument :hlines defaults >>> to 'no'? >> >> Ok, but why is there then a hline in the raw output in table-three? >> Furthermore, setting hlines to yes makes no difference: > > * test > #+NAME: table-one > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp > (list '(a) '(b) 'hline '(c)) > #+END_SRC > > #+results: table-one > | a | > | b | > |---| > | c | > > > #+NAME: table-two > #+CALL: table-one[:hlines yes]() > #+results: table-two > | a | > | b | > | c | > > but > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=table-one :hlines yes > table > #+end_src > > #+results: > | a | > | b | > |---| > | c | > > seems to be a problem with #+CALL then ... The ":hlines yes" header argument must be set on the call line itself. See (info "(org)Evaluating code blocks").