From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [RFC] About `org-export-with-\(fixed-width\|tables\)' Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:44:53 -0500 Message-ID: <87y53hga7u.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <871u1999rr.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtNzW-0008UZ-40 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:45:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtNzO-0003FU-Lr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:45:14 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtNzO-0003Dg-FI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:45:06 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VtNzN-0006DH-0a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:45:05 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:45:05 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:45:05 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > At the moment, `org-export-with-fixed-width' and > `org-export-with-tables' (or their OPTIONS equivalent ::t and |:t) are > broken when not set to their default value. Also, "fixing" them is not > trivial. I think this is a good time to ponder about their usefulness. > > Indeed, I don't think anyone would want to remove tables (or fixed-width > areas) from Org syntax. These variables were probably written because > tables and fixed-width can occasionally get in the way, on very specific > lines. > > However, Org already provides ways to work around such problems. For > example, a table can be wrapped within an example block, or an offending > line can start with \vert instead of "|". > > Therefore, in today's Org, they don't make much sense anymore. As > a consequence, I'd like to either: > > 1. Remove them completely from code base; > AFAIAC, they can go. > 2. Change their meaning so they behave like `org-export-with-toc' or > `org-export-with-tags', that is: when `org-export-with-tables' is > set to nil, all tables are ignored during export. > > I don't think option 2 is really useful, but I don't mind either way. > > > WDYT? > Nick