From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan L Tyree Subject: Re: Narrowing vs indirect buffer Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:17:13 +1100 Message-ID: <87y524n41y.fsf@breezy.my.home> References: <52E2E3D5.2030303@gmail.com> <874n4slsks.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6tkN-00043X-MO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:17:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6tkJ-0006lJ-2a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:17:27 -0500 In-reply-to: <874n4slsks.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Emacs Orgmode Bastien writes: > Alan L Tyree writes: > >> Is there any preference (so far as org is concerned)? Are there any >> "gotchas" that I should note? > > Just a personal preference: I use narrowing because I don't like > multiplying buffers. Thanks Bastien. I like narrowing a lot better but only just discovered it. It is a terrific facility. Cheers, Alan -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan Tel: 04 2748 6206 sip:172385@iptel.org