From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Org-link-escape-chars (was Incorrect hexification in URLs in LaTeX Export) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87y50nele8.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <0DEDD4E4-A513-4B03-AA78-25D9859EEA9F@gmail.com> <87fvn32dcm.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <4846AB82-370A-48F1-97DC-6319ECA261A5@gmail.com> <53163B6A.5000200@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLURA-0001Wa-26 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 04:18:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLUR3-0006HU-IX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 04:17:56 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLUR3-0006HA-Bb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 04:17:49 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLUR0-0002Jt-VC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:17:46 +0100 Received: from vpn-2005.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:17:46 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2005.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:17:46 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "R. Michael Weylandt" writes: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Simon Thum wrote: >> This seems to be a question of objective. Do you want to encode, i.e. >> maintain some reversible original in an url no matter what, or do you want >> to fix url's which wouldn't otherwise be legal? In the latter case, the >> question mark should probably be retained. >> I am not sure, that I understand what you say here. But in case you want to convince me, that exporting non-working links when the user supplies working links is a feature and not a bug, you will have a hard time ;-) - Andreas > > I believe the former. If the user types in a working link, the > exporter shouldn't break it. > > This could be fixed by sprinkling org-url-decode through various > backends, but that suggests to me that the problem may be "upstream." > > Michael