From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: proposal for improved integration of cdlatex
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:54:34 +0200
Message-ID: <87y4uyxflx.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAKrPhPP03gBg9MMPw2Q3pA0Zw_=syohibpxmJSsYuZ+5ZXVjpg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54468)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XG1Ti-0004dQ-CW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 03:54:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1XG1Ta-0006uD-Tf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 03:54:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPP03gBg9MMPw2Q3pA0Zw_=syohibpxmJSsYuZ+5ZXVjpg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Federico Beffa's message of "Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:23:26 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> writes:

> Do you think it is now a reasonable implementation? Would it be a
> suitable tiny change to `org-mode'?

Yes, applied. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou