From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: LaTeX exporter Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 21:38:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4st6lai.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbE6Z-0000Qf-N0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:38:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbE6O-00044Z-4f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:37:59 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:47753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbE6N-000439-TY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:37:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:28:36 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello, Fabrice Popineau writes: > The org-latex-classes variable handles a couple of parameters like > DEFAULT-PACKAGES, PACKAGES and EXTRA. > > I thing that this variable could also benefit from an EXTRA_OPTIONS > parameter. > This could allow to have a default set of options for the curent class, but > to locally > add a couple of options you may not always want. > > What do you think ? The OPTIONS keyword hasn't much to do with latex classes. It is handled at a very different level (i.e., "ox.el"). IMO, it would be confusing to mix them. I think you want a couple of dedicated SETUPFILE keywords. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou