From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: gnupg-2.1.0-4 Breaks Encryption in Emacs. Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:25:10 +0800 Message-ID: <87y4qqh095.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <547D7E81.9080700@wilkesley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvjcc-0006PU-Jd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:19:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvjcV-0006xL-8D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:19:50 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvjcV-0006x8-1O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:19:43 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvjcS-0005j9-Rr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 10:19:40 +0100 Received: from 221.216.165.218 ([221.216.165.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 10:19:40 +0100 Received: from eric by 221.216.165.218 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 10:19:40 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ian Barton writes: > This happened to me yesterday. Thought I would re-post here as there > is a potential loss of data and I use org-mode in my encrypted files. > > Symptoms are errors like: > > Opening output file: [pub f 1024 17 3B6F8AF143C21F3B 1320594077 > 1509822256 nil u nil ...], 15 > > The error only happens when you change the content and try to save the > file. Sometimes the file will be deleted (thank goodness for git). > > Bug report here: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/42972 > > Ian. Thanks for this! I'd noted it broke, but didn't realize data loss was a possibility... E