From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:42:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87y4nfklub.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87ioezooi2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw4bpaiu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8761aznpiq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87twyjnh0r.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oaopx24e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87k2zd4f3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87egpkv8g9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <877fv6xfaq.fsf@gmail.com> <87twya2ak0.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj81aa97.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioep2r6p.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4ngbgm7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy39qt2.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87pp8rb1i3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnkbrver.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9u3avtu.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twy3qbbj.fsf@gmx.us> <87d24rauik.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp8r0zm2.fsf@gmx.us> <878uffaskn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZz3-0004rE-Fl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:42:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZyy-0007Jb-D6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:42:45 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:64828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSZyy-0007J9-2W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:42:40 -0500 Received: from W530 ([46.166.188.200]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9ra4-1YLxCQ3mdE-00B5ck for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:42:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878uffaskn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:27:20 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> It would enable "complicated argument [@k1;@k2;@k3]", which is pretty >> nice. There's still no pre and post notes etc, only keys. > > Shortcuts are simple citations that ought to be available in most > back-ends. I don't see your example as a particularly straightforward > one. I suggest to use > > [(cite):@k1;@k2;@k3] That also fine, though for the simple case slightly less readable. > Note that your example doesn't even provide an in-text equivalent while > [@k1] has @k1. But that's OK since I can easily formulate this in "human-language": "@k1, @k2, and @k3 argues =E2=8B=AF" =E2=86=92 "A1 (Y1), A2 (Y2), and A3= (Y3) argues" Whereas I can't easily do "Argument (@k1;@k2;@k3)" =E2=86=92 "Argument (A1 Y1; A2 Y2; A3 Y3)" Perhaps I'm thinking too much in terms of text/parenthesis citations here. =E2=80=94Rasmus --=20 . . . The proofs are technical in nature and provides no real understanding