From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: ox-koma bug in subtree export Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:46:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4ihk5ho.fsf@gmx.us> References: <20150715112057.GI18343@chitra.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFL9i-0006jo-49 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:47:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFL9Z-0008T7-6L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:47:18 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFL9Z-0008SW-0Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:47:09 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFL9W-00086j-Qa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:47:06 +0200 Received: from 46.166.188.226 ([46.166.188.226]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:47:06 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.188.226 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:47:06 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Suvayu Ali writes: > I'm using subtree export to write letters using ox-koma. Everything > works except, all the closing statements from different subtrees get > accumulated when I export one of the subtrees. > > So with the attached Org file, when I export either of the subtrees, I > get a closing line like this: \closing{Regards, Kind Regards,}. For your purpose you can add an :export_closing: property to your top-level heading. * letter 1 :PROPERTIES: :export_subject: Some subject :export_closing: Regards, :END: > This used to work before. That said, I never found it quite consistent > when using `#+closing:'. I would have thought one should use a headline > like: to, enclosed, etc. Maybe: * Regards, :closing: Signature > Is this a bug? >From you example, I'd say 'no'. Keywords are shared. E.g. if you have #+latex_header: my important package You'd want it to be loaded even when using a subtree. [OTOH, #+title is changed in subtree export....] Rasmus -- C is for Cookie