From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: mimetype for orgmode files Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 07:24:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3s6yoch.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <9DD14FAF-F39A-44B4-8E9A-DE2A1ED93EAD@martelli.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRvj7-0001gu-6A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 03:24:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRvj4-0007bL-0R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 03:24:57 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: John Kitchin Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" , Mario Martelli , Grant Rettke Hi John, John Kitchin writes: > Could we come to an agreement on "text/x-org" or "text/x-orgmode" and > document that on orgmode.org? I'd vote for "text/x-org". The "mode" part sounds emacsy, which is precisely not the point for a mimetype. I can add this sentence to orgmode.org's homepage: The /de facto/ mimetype for org attachments is "text/x-org". Or any better suggestion? -- Bastien