From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 12:29:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3j9gzy5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wp0a57i5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d121yhwf.fsf@bzg.fr> <874llxikm4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zi3pcvid.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es5Lm-000648-QQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 06:29:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es5Lm-0001vh-0s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 06:29:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zi3pcvid.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Sat, 03 Mar 2018 11:18:34 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Achim Gratz , Org Mode List Hello, Bastien Guerry writes: > Nothing, please move ahead. Great. > I suggest to rename the file org.org, which will produce org.texi. I don't understand this part. Currently, "manual.org" is exported as "org.texi" per #+export_file_name: org.texi So we are getting the best of both worlds. Am I missing something? > Or org-manual.org, which seems more readable. I think "manual.org" is simpler, but I do not mind renaming it to "org-manual.org". However, I find "org.org" silly. In any case, I let you decide the name before moving forward. > It would be great to have org-guide.org too, but I guess that's a > lot of work. It's a joke compared to manual.org. However, we first need to agree on a style guide for "manual.org". Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou