From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: suppress ++ markup in orgmode? Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:21:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87y39fwpx4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <6AE2E011-4192-42FE-847A-274E6E38D3C8@ucsd.edu> <87lg5mmass.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNNn-0007aH-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:21:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNNi-0007oc-OL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:21:26 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:48401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNNi-0007oH-HZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:21:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (John Kitchin's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:45:30 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: John Kitchin Cc: org-mode-email , Charles Berry Hello, John Kitchin writes: > hm. I would have interpreted it as an empty string with a strikethrough, > followed by a plus. It makes sense to require 1 or more characters > between them though. > > Why is +-+ not a - with a strikethrough? Because it is a table line? It was a bug I was not very motivated to fix. It should now be fixed on the export side, at least. I.e., "+-+" is exported as a strike-through. > Or + + is not a space with a strikethrough. I guess there are word > boundaries required. Striking through nothing doesn't make sense, does it? In any case, blanks are forbidden in the inner part of the markers. > I thought it was interesting that ++ + and + ++ show no strikethrough, but > ++ ++ does. Evidently a strikethrough on + +. An editor, on the other > hand, might want to strikeout excess spaces. We have to strike a balance here. Allowing emphasis markup around spaces has more cons than pros, IMO. > It isn't a big deal, I just changed the editmark syntax to avoid > clashing with org-syntax. The real issue here is that you're trying to bend Org syntax to fit a foreign syntax. It may imply pain. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou