From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typos
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:07:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87y2wf1kuy.fsf@kyleam.com>
References: <874kz9mcpm.fsf@bernoul.li> <875zjj30uc.fsf@kyleam.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39310)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1iW7A1-0005Lh-2x
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:07:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1iW7A0-0000rd-1T
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:07:21 -0500
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53084)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kyle@kyleam.com>) id 1iW79z-0000r5-QQ
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:07:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <875zjj30uc.fsf@kyleam.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li>, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs@rickster.com

Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> writes:

> Jonas Bernoulli <jonas@bernoul.li> writes:
>
>> Please consider applying the below patch, which fixes many spelling
>> errors.
>
> Eh, there's some good ones in there.

I wish I could say that having a typo in the first sentence of the reply
was intentional :/