From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] specify a time, not number of minutes to keep, with org-resolve-clock Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 11:22:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2tmd2ug.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87sgk4o2j2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87imkuwhs4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixpv5-00011g-KH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 05:22:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ixpv4-00082u-4t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 05:22:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87imkuwhs4.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:47:55 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Cc: Dan Drake , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Bastien writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> TINYCHANGE is only about the number of non-trivial lines of code in >> your patch (15 or so). > > I would not say "non-trivial lines" of code. > > The change should be less *than 15 lines or so* to be accepted. > > I may be wrong, but this is how I read this: > https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html I disagree. As stated in this page, only lines of code significant copyright-wise count. Commenting a line of code, changing indentation (e.g., when you wrap a `let') do not count. You cannot copyright an indentation change. Nor a symbol renaming (this example is even given in the page above). Also, applying the same change multiple times may count /at most/ once. So, I stand on my ground: there is a "non-trivial" part to take into consideration when counting locs. I would go even further: when you transform a string regexp into a rx regexp, there is no line to count, because there is no new idea to copyright in the first place. This is a trivial change. Anyway, I think arguing here is just wasting our time. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou