From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WM0iJhRTOl+8TAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:51:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UB/2IRRTOl/DCAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:51:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA8A9403A0 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7bdj-0002Xo-Dr for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:41:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7bdO-0002Wx-W7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:40:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::530]:41658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7bdN-00034K-Dt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:40:54 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id w17so11726157edt.8 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:40:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5n2pWQsZYu4bT+ZlGdZVo7amhfBBhNQUyl1QjsWJKs0=; b=XzyrXAnmzJVKmZZG+ZEHkFKgrHBuXzFOJlOjOUHxp5Sx4huVB5bhbMRtCazHWviMot l4pMRGg5OpgBOOGSCeOody8sTUTUUS4ERMxKjuJDdmlwxDePOVfP0BfsKnQoVo/ow6Ti B7jsDsh3hCGOUn/kkmRiyVkisq3XOdmHbV7tPGX3yR/hNPAAj+F4WVXpeZxhyvmCdgYn 2MfbEGoMQvzUmbTlyX9ZhNjSSowfMbkHS3j+G2+8MyCscRorAz9x5IrQq9lgUpC8rgBm aaKMCAr96EqvsjE5NjrPBOCXIwluhc6eVa77fnd/TiLMWIgZ7vrAT4C/fmY24R8CL9fd LvUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5n2pWQsZYu4bT+ZlGdZVo7amhfBBhNQUyl1QjsWJKs0=; b=FdRiYFZoS2B0+uGUTYEG7lIAUS9v2d3fZqu/NaLHTCr5dybGRSju1y/YQb0RyeVNti hz87XxdjUM3cAThJ+whBNpDBlxZK0/9O4IUTCWDE7gJZ1Rp16Zg4o+yojh5/ZAD2ryUZ OgYtwhmqGRUc22vL/MOTwX4PUhnwvA2xoltI9vy0xhL2HTcJDsDc18mm96sEkJ8l4Cs4 v05gj0xjM0qzCfPwbgdj1I5GLc5fSnciHgRpQ8+/DoZnpQyoICCc96TSV5n4ggQ/Bis6 tVfKv0CisCQi2FW/ur/xwKsHTFfxyrxNglZvOLGXFAniz9+NDvQ0djpToiD+7g8ygDnK CwyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dJxRaMxDHQsyoEQL/ceznG3B1+6NKFNUmQBCx+qSBZTlc//j6 kC5GpZy3O81XXZtG52Ucgro= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJ27UW8hPxuaW9WzNoJ4drEvdxt432zUZwULPdaL5QDAVRlARVtMlW/Ej8PfMMmQCz1U1wxg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3199:: with SMTP id di25mr14420863edb.315.1597657251393; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aspire-5942 (p200300ecdf256856fd8180b1772c5ca6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ec:df25:6856:fd81:80b1:772c:5ca6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pv28sm13693682ejb.71.2020.08.17.02.40.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Marco Wahl To: Gustavo Barros Subject: Re: [Feature Request] More flexibility in org-speed-commands customization References: <87v9hzzhrn.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:40:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v9hzzhrn.fsf@gmail.com> (Gustavo Barros's message of "Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:49:48 -0300") Message-ID: <87y2mdobj2.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::530; envelope-from=marcowahlsoft@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x530.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XzyrXAnm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: tpS+PFmOaYWs Hi Gustavo, > Org's speed keys are a very interesting feature to which I've long > been attracted to. And indeed, I've flirted with it a number of times > in the past. But every time I do so, I end up stepping back, because > I get weary of fat fingering my documents. The whole set of speed > keys is more powerful than what I would wish. I'd love to have speed > keys for navigation and visibility, but I would also gladly refrain > from these "too handy" editing keys. > > As things stand, the speed keys are defined by combining > `org-speed-commands-default', a defconst, and > `org-speed-commands-user', a defcustom. But the former already > contains a large set of speed keys, including some quite powerful > editing ones. And it is thus hard to remove these keys. > > Of course, it is possible. We could shadow the same key in > `org-speed-commands-user' to do nothing. Or, though a defconst, > `org-speed-commands-default' can be redefined after loading Org. The > first is clumsy, and renders the `org-speed-command-help' buffer quite > confusing. The second feels wrong (because it is). > > I don't know if there is a strong reason to hard-code the set of keys > in `org-speed-commands-default'. But, if there isn't, could you > consider (somehow) exposing the whole set of `org-speed-commands' to > user customization? This sounds like a good idea to me. Do you already have a respective patch? Best regards, -- Marco