From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6CE6NKX8PGBrIgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:39:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 6C8mMKX8PGCJVgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:39:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF5DC629 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:39:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48894 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjhs-0007MF-9Q for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:39:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjFR-0001Sf-8U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:10:09 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjFO-0007KQ-UH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:10:08 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53500160061 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:10:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1614607804; bh=QYnNqH131TOUg2V2m8OJwK+oWETn+OSyuIyCh+9vNmg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=ZSCov4DheN5hldoOVc/hZ9rNJmBjFxtFEe6EMGLUjUa6gYgRdlSQdLUQ0CAXCYeh6 l5LYQPWpNXHe8Wh41EYvEtBt6oxGIx+DOExIRZ2hgXBk6PTPCTItdg6b1sGOy3jQx8 fLz0GbYtNL9SwCX/PpQx8dxWkL90bf6+CvVoTA3NcwfSFDF2AuQYLmcpz2cl/3ykiz nDKzAdO8zz/g+vmdr8Px4nUXYXFCBGEF6af8//SC7cIv3kbZOQuxcHB9xwvDe4IhhN fxK1uHFVqKifJD8gg1sl04O22JnbcksV+bRCchaQI5m4RCEdOoBp0Jp3k6b7phflmU jeL2MG0mJ1ysQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Dq2G34DrNz6tmY; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:10:03 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: "Julian M. Burgos" Subject: Re: [tip for EXWM users] An alternative method for isolate trees References: <877dmr119y.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:10:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Julian M. Burgos's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:37:37 +0000") Message-ID: <87y2f7yngl.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: orgmode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614609573; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=QYnNqH131TOUg2V2m8OJwK+oWETn+OSyuIyCh+9vNmg=; b=SHZjqP0r4DBFwCvpeiysreuJTlWlKVvDuXpQ0/Eyqazb++ncLaslx0YQAsUeZkfYBRDeqr JHQx+bTIOt03Eltligk8jaM/TWeetceVTFyt+wtP0F9IM50BmhYZOpzfG+e7LHUch+2JKU Al9jXJ2ieBXvmgOQTEengMLCxJzyGiH233pkv4gSq40B/7AzJRr1dStVII6JTBl4rzeffH ASdx99RLI/6L510JoYuH3Sw2RAG1ZEjovSXXNz/0TwxZmX3fCYjYrgLYWZ2BzEkrzqbOtZ KpyB+BtHT8skiDMYhgBO5pTeRmjKgQ/WRvGusNHpZekOX1/YQlXrFHa0/p0Qeg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614609573; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RJmU0n3ctbhE62QU/t2X4769FsM0EV5i2Ifj3G2mc5RwQnk2VzZbeKGjsJ9U0AfYYlkGhK BMYviDveL80BwKOHXlHtFPuB/dWxc6L01OEIhLcgtvhDTmPOQP1zDuULQrzEmtVpdVqzGg 2tRPHvPsN259zWqVXdMr8Bpo89aixkxvWsBzijvpmjKV8RCfIAKXd743IOa8eoU06mQwE6 kebwQ5hh4AiJlvNfobAUQq6lggAaTu+gBTbT/eFJwlNWgXowCb4rjVlvqpuJMMkrulfiKl CMbQOFl4R3QekDclkptgggmg+hAg0QXCYA/ag+SGjRuhIFJI38X7IRbcr6ZcPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=ZSCov4Dh; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.06 Authentication-Results: aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=ZSCov4Dh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1DF5DC629 X-Spam-Score: -3.06 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: eO/in3iaorHU Hi Julian, thanks for your comment. "Julian M. Burgos" writes: > Thank you, although I tested your functions and compared with the > original org-tree-to-indirect-buffer, the only difference I see is > that your function creates a new exwm workspace. The original function > already creates indirect buffers with their own names (using a slash > instead of the double colons). Or I am missing something? org-tree-to-indirect-buffer creates a new buffer, but (as far as I know) does not allow accumulating buffers. In other words, you cannot have several isolated trees at the time. In this method it just occurred to me to configure org-indirect-buffer-display as new-frame and take advantage of EXWM frame management. Best regards, Juan Manuel