From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug in #+CATEGORY Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:09:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87wt10par5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWsXn-00080B-2r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:11:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWsXl-0007zY-4B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:11:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWsXk-0007zU-TK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:11:48 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.236]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWsVA-0002zL-IF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:09:08 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so108172nze for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:09:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Thu\, 29 Mar 2007 11\:27\:46 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Leo writes: > Now go to "* A" and type "C-x n s" and then bring up the agenda by > "C-c a a" and you can see "Call someone" is in Category A although it > should be in Category B. Yes, i can reproduce that. And I guess it might be related to a bug i was about to submit. In the global TODO list buffer, instead of archiving (C-c $) the current headline the cursor is on, Org will archive the whole tree the task is a subtree of. Which might lead to a "Doh! Where is my project?"-bug. For example : ,---- | * Blorg | #+CATEGORY: blorg | #+ARCHIVE: archives/blorg_archive:: | | ** DONE publish blorg examples `---- Archiving the task marked DONE will put the whole "* Blorg" tree in archives/blorg_archives.org. Does anyone encounter such a problem ? Regards, -- Bastien