From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] List improvement v.2 Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:09:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87wrr1aexq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> References: <87ocdzw7gq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <43BA920D-4EA2-4C51-B941-33A60D097EB3@gmail.com> <87hbi6uprt.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87y6bhajrm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44156 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orrdo-0000zu-78 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:14:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orrdm-0006zc-9G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:14:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:48552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orrdm-0006zJ-23 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:14:38 -0400 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so3512309wwb.30 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:14:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Matt Lundin , Org Mode List Hello, >>>>> Carsten Dominik writes: > One possibility to improve performance would then be to have C-c C-c > not do that, but to only do that when changing a bullet type or so. > I think that C-c C-c to toggle a bullet is a good key and should be > fast, also for long lists. Sorry for not being clear. With the patch, C-c C-c will still be fast! On my laptop, with a 500+ items list, C-c C-x C-b is now instantaneous, while C-c C-c has a delay (almost unnoticeable) of about 0.2 s (that is, both without any statistics to update). Moreover, reducing C-c C-c to only toggle checkboxes when on a checkboxed item will prevent anyone to fix indentation, numbering, or integrity of a list containing only checkboxes with that key-binding. Look at this list: 1. [ ] some 3. [ ] checkboxed 4. [ ] list How would you repair it then? You could move an item up and down, but it doesn't feel so natural. The gain of speed is so small that I don't think we should bother, with regards to what we would lose. Regards, -- Nicolas