From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Memnon Anon Subject: Re: bulk relative time shift (in org file)? Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <87wrf44yp7.fsf@mean.albasani.net> References: <871uyaogg9.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <87k4bn8a5p.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <87sjq6up5y.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5zynmda.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <8739hvv6ce.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlnYC-0007Xm-Ac for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:44:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlnYA-0004od-Ji for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:44:20 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:53273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlnYA-0004oW-Bh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:44:18 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QlnY8-0007RF-Sb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:44:16 +0200 Received: from e178195001.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.195.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:44:16 +0200 Received: from gegendosenfleisch by e178195001.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:44:16 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, Bastien writes: > On an item, `C-c C-s' and `C-c C-d' now allows you to use > "+2d" to say "schedule in 2 days from today" or "++2d" to > say "schedule in 2 days from existing timestamp". > > In agenda, `B s' and `B d' will also understand this and > let you reschedule/redeadline items relatively. > > Let me know if this works okay for you -- and thanks for > bringing this up again! "++" looks very useful! I pinged Michael who started this thread, I hope we'll get an update on his perspective. Thanks alot! Memnon