From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: What do you use to identify projects (in the GTD sense)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:18:04 -0500
Message-ID: <87wra2eorn.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <CACHMzOHa8=ehOA3y+0kmJHVcfi0oN-RbC1_BObGXRaJoCG_sWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ty7ge2p1.fsf@norang.ca> <20111211164948.GA1082@kenny.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53481)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RZriv-0008QE-3i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:18:21 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RZriu-00019u-5r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:18:21 -0500
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:43766)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RZriu-00019m-3s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:18:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20111211164948.GA1082@kenny.fritz.box> (Viktor Rosenfeld's
	message of "Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:49:48 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36@googlemail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36@googlemail.com> writes:

> I use Bernt's approach with a few modifications. Basically I don't use
> subprojects. I think Bernt's handling of subprojects is broken, because
> a NEXT keyword burried in a subproject keeps the entire project off the
> stuck projects lists. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.)

It's possible it's broken :) but subprojects are considered separately
for the stuck project list.  It is true that if any subproject has a
NEXT task then the overall project is not stuck (but doesn't that makes
sense?)

* TODO Project
** TODO SubProject A
*** NEXT Task One
** TODO SubProject B
*** TODO Task Two

In the above layout Project is not stuck (it has Task One as a NEXT
task) but SubProject B is stuck (it has no next task and shows up on the
stuck project list)

Also as soon as Task One is DONE than both SubProject A and Project are
both stuck until a new NEXT task is identified (or they are in turn
marked DONE)

Regards,
Bernt