From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Macro question with new texinfo exporter Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:51:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87wquth35i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <877gmvalzn.fsf@gmail.com> <87vcae53fi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87haly96xi.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjzqejhz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wquumhqk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0uXr-0006wa-1z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:51:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0uXm-0004kd-58 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:51:14 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]:55875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U0uXl-0004kW-Uq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:51:10 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x43so2113568wey.24 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:51:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wquumhqk.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:24:51 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-mode , "Thomas S. Dye" Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > OTOH, the change will happen during a major release. Moreover macros > belong to an export framework which have been totally rewritten. Must we > cope with backward compatibility in this case ? I'd say "as much as we can", yes. But if an incompatible change must appear, 8.0 is a good timing, I agree. Now back to the issue at hand, what about simply allowing to escape the , and " characters? This was Thomas first try, and a natural one I'd say. What do you think? -- Bastien