From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Org-Mode Reference Card "bug"
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:27:36 +0100
Message-ID: <87wqtqnjj2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <trinity-19d068d0-5879-4998-9cbc-5e09b8c8ba6a-1361961451758@3capp-webde-bs45>
	<4205.1361992685@alphaville> <86k3ps9645.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<23169.1362062462@alphaville>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48815)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UBkLn-0002H6-0z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:11:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UBkLj-0006mm-Qz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:11:34 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:64342)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UBkLj-0006mc-Kc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:11:31 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi8so375808wib.7
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 03:11:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <23169.1362062462@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Thu, 28
	Feb 2013 09:41:02 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nick,

Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:

> However, the formula without the @ in front of III *also* works in this
> case.  I don't know whether that's an accident or intended behavior.

FWIW, I don't know neither... maybe Carsten can tell.

-- 
 Bastien