From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daimrod Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make `org-contacts-message-complete-function' work with byte compilation Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:21:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqtemgv0.fsf@tanger.home> References: <87sj449hcb.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <87ppz6on3b.fsf@tanger.home> <87vc8yjusl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEyub-0002kO-Mp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEyuX-0001zZ-S0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:53247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEyuX-0001zO-Kl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so786328wib.0 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 02:20:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vc8yjusl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:48:58 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Achim Gratz writes: > Daimrod writes: >> @All: Can I use (require 'cl) and ignore the warning or is there better >> solution? > > You could if this would never go into mainline, where it is not allowed > due to the namespace pollution that cl causes. You could use cl-lib > instead, but then this would be an Emacs-24 only solution. In general, > the stanza ((eval-when-compile (require 'cl)) only works as intended > when you are only using cl macros, but you seem to use defuns. You > could check how hard it is to replace these with plain elisp, aside from > syntactical inconveniences this is usually not a big problem. I've done this, thanks for the advice. > Regards, > Achim. =2D-=20 Daimrod/Greg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRPaIqAAoJEBNzVHcrZRiU2+8P/1QWLU7tSpdgFJXvd5EFrtXX cIm2hcd6dQXHdw5wBwWRJHZJ81d5y3CTgWalNB7SRfi9dM7B5VrubQz95HabQfjv LEydhJ+ZKRmMxB2DTIMvc7g22xmA57/8ATb59Xnoc2lA1WwsKymR3wz6qnjmSS+P 4SVO1Lksye4EXLgEFwC1k6aCnUTS/vItTHpigHlB6Wwc259aFB1Zq2Pl93SM6HuK Md8+IDYdN9son3nVcVtDOtMXJZYF151WX71QjDoxK6gbVOi2Nk5+u9/ZAxC7xZY8 seF54/0ULTlPBLOiHrhsY1JE8URWa/yduLHUdDKAZJwaEv+QdchYNdH35pmiNzqf rrZGd0us5qNxxzXu/3ozoXp96+YmaB5XrKPbO3a40304SqAXVFTtqGQpmAiMdo+h DrXrqNRPR6EJqfGf8+ZN320t1wjHLXzf+10DGIHv6kQN2ybZnuQrkE3BPD8ODXbQ J8DZG2yp7Gx1bMXhxK1Qd26P/cDNXu3t4dlDAIo+wcjyhAruqo+wPEa89qXqM6Y9 X4IhwUAzj9WnJthHrO3yih+u5Xsd16mJsrWuJTywjbVDd6n2rc9WgRP0XmQVeyvV ld/7ifI++LnEEzuWAuqUcZ6OLY2lKw46X1RmmQs9slyMUQYDw4WqZkqZrBNVRA2d xh3VcS/+gQF+r2o1hBW9 =GntW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--