From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: [patch] ox-koma-letter.el: credit [1/4] Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 02:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqqusder.fsf@pank.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeDxd-0003oa-15 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:28:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeDxa-0002SP-P7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:28:20 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:62470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeDxa-0002SG-F6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:28:18 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org, n.goaziou@gmail.com With this and the following patches I have tried to add some functionality to the ox-koma-letter.el-file. I'll try to summarize in each email. This one just updates the credit: most importantly with Viktor. As neither git, changelongs nor lisp are incorporated as a natural element of my native tongue I'd very much appreciate any criticisms and test reports. My lisp skills are very basic. I haven't signed any FSF papers, but I'm happy to do so if the patches are of interest. Probably it isn't really that important with the file only living in contrib. =E2=80=93Rasmus Two bonus question: - In this patch I tried to get git remove the second part where it adds and removes the "lco" part. But with two rebase goes I did not succeed. Is it safe to hand edit git-produced patches? - Is it me or is there no option to have git send-email just fix a the subject and heads and let the email program do the rest?! The manual and various blog post did not reveal how on earth to get it to just use Gnus for sending. . . The program seems not really to follow the Unix principle. . . -- Dung makes an excellent fertilizer