From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Handshake: Org-mode + Emacs releases Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 16:00:02 +0530 Message-ID: <87wqjouamt.fsf_-_@gmail.com> References: <1763930.BASVGl8U4n@linux-j9m3.site> <5309190.T1LboKNIW4@linux-j9m3.site> <87txesri12.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87txesri12.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 01 Dec 2013 11:18:33 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org Nicolas Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I have a half baked patch which allows to use export framework to handle > radio tables. I'll try to complete it by the end of the year and propose > it on the ML. I see that you are adding features and doing a very quick iteration. Nothing wrong with it and each sprint has been well-timed and planned. I am a bit apprehensive that (what you think as) essentials MAY get missed in Vanilla Emacs proper. So it would be good if you could communicate with Emacs developers the Org-mode features that you want packed in the upcoming Emacs release. (If this is already communicated, well and good) Stefan was indicating mid-December for the current release. Needless to say, having features bundled as part of pre-test builds would get more beta-testing and coverage.