From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: C-c C-e h h (export to html) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:46:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqdficba.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <877g5g5vq0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87iop04fs8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87lhtw1lp3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvk4s05c.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn4z4-00050G-4n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:47:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn4yy-00071r-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:46:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:52606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn4yy-00071g-3h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:46:52 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id n15so2584260wiw.8 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 04:46:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Dave Pawson's message of "Wed, 21 May 2014 10:12:39 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dave Pawson Cc: org-mode list Hi Dave, Dave Pawson writes: > On 20 May 2014 20:47, Bastien wrote: > >> Yes, you need `C-c C-e h h' with Org >8.0. > > Odd. With my full .emacs file. > C-c C-e h (and nothing happens at all) Because the keystroke is incomplete. It needs to be one of these: C-c C-e h h C-c C-e h H C-c C-e h o > h again and (if it's working) I get the message 'Wrote > /dir/file.html' Yes. > With no .emacs the first h produces message > HTML export done, pushed to kill ring and clipboard > h again and the h is 'entered' into the current buffer? Because with no .emacs you are relying on the builtin Emacs version of Org, which is certainly 7.8.11. Try M-x org-version RET in both cases and you will see the difference. HTH, -- Bastien