From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sort TODO entries more usefully
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 07:10:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87wqd93z20.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <8738fyctic.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mwe65pxy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<878upqvzxg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55583)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WonBK-0005K6-38
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 01:10:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WonBE-0006Dk-7G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 01:10:42 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:56173)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WonBD-0006DY-VR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 01:10:36 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m15so7242169wgh.4
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <878upqvzxg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of
	"Sun, 25 May 2014 19:51:55 +0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Sure! The actual ordering of stuff was an arbitrary choice on my part --
> the only thing I cared about was getting done and not-done separated.
> This looks like a tidier solution, to boot...

Applied, thanks!

-- 
 Bastien