From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Lawrence Subject: Re: org-cite and org-citeproc Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:11:56 -0700 Message-ID: <87wq1uef9f.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <87twx5hs2x.fsf@berkeley.edu> <871tk560p3.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <878uedgeuq.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4mckh1p.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3s261to.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdgnS-0004sb-SC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:12:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdgnP-0003Tn-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:12:42 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdgnP-0003TE-FG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:12:39 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YdgnJ-0000fU-Pt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:12:33 +0200 Received: from c-67-169-117-151.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.169.117.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:12:33 +0200 Received: from richard.lawrence by c-67-169-117-151.hsd1.ca.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:12:33 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Eric and all, Eric S Fraga writes: > On Wednesday, 1 Apr 2015 at 08:49, Andreas Leha wrote: > > [...] > >> I am a happy biblatex user for all my 'own' documents. But (as was >> mentioned previously) scientific journals that accept latex submissions >> will require bibtex and won't support biblatex. So, I'd say that one of >> the other methods (preferably bibtex) is still necessary. > > Ahhh, yes, I'd forgotten that journals expect bibtex. This is a key > requirement for me as well therefore. Can someone suggest how a parenthetical citation with common prefix and suffix data, like [(cite): For more on this topic, see:; @Work1 for a review; @Work2; and references therein.] should map to plain BibTeX? Maybe there is no general answer to this question, but what would a reasonable default be? Maybe this? (For more on this topic, see: \cite{Work1} for a review, \cite{Work2}, and references therein.) That is, just place the prefix and suffix data in the surrounding text, inserting commas after the part for each individual work, and wrapping the whole thing in parentheses? Thanks! Best, Richard