From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:45:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpvj8n17.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87zj0fd07u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze8tr-0004bc-Qs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:45:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze8to-0003jK-Ju for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:45:27 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:39375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze8to-0003j6-Dp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:45:24 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze8ti-0001TO-Ux for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:45:19 +0200 Received: from 46.166.188.202 ([46.166.188.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:45:18 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.188.202 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 23:45:18 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Sebastian Boehm writes: > >> I would like to propose adding the KOMA-script scrartcl class to the >> list of supported ox-latex classes. scrartcl is one of the most >> popular "article" alternatives out there and it would be great to be >> able to pass org files using scrartcl to other Org mode users without >> having to explain ox-latex custom settings. >> >> The attached patch changes ox-latex.el to include scrartcl in >> org-latex-classes. > > Thank you. But can't users needing a non-default class customize their > own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to offer it out > of the box? It's absolutely a much more pleasant experience than article, at least if you agree with the KOMA-guys' margin opinion (e.g. top:bottom margin is fixed at 1:2). [I've been using the KOMA-bundle for years and years]. The patch is also subjective, e.g. it does not feature \minisec[.]{.}. ox-koma-article.el would be awesome but until then, there's no point in adding it. Rasmus -- I feel emotional landscapes they puzzle me