From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: org-preview-latex-fragment for @@latex:stuff@@? Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:00:35 +0000 Message-ID: <87wpt7zs98.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> References: <87wpta17ey.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a19Wj-00011o-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:04:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a19We-00028c-Vf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:04:41 -0500 Received: from mail-db3on0130.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.130]:14486 helo=emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a19We-00028C-Nc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 04:04:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: (John Kitchin's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:42:24 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Kitchin Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Monday, 23 Nov 2015 at 14:42, John Kitchin wrote: > True enough! I wasn't thinking very large when I had the question in > mind! I end up with a lot of chemical formulas like this > @@latex:\ce{H_{2}O}@@ in my writing because the {} inside the {} makes OT but just wondering: shouldn't this be @@latex:\ce{H2O}@@? And this would work just fine without the @@ directive for LaTeX export at least. -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.5.1, Org release_8.3.2-215-gb4af3f