From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtPVF0gQSBuZXcgd2ViIGJyb3dzZXLigL0=?= Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:26:15 +0800 Message-ID: <87wpo7a56g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87potzvlp0.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoibX-0004n3-OV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 22:26:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoibU-0001MV-IJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 22:26:31 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoibU-0001MQ-CB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 22:26:28 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aoibS-0004sF-L5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:26:27 +0200 Received: from 222.128.163.222 ([222.128.163.222]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:26:26 +0200 Received: from eric by 222.128.163.222 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:26:26 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Porter writes: > Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > >> https://vivaldi.com/ >> >> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or >> (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, >> though I do not have too high hopes. > > It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest > myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was > Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I > don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it > ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has > committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other > alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. > > Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera > devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the > same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's > proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while now, and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard driven, which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem to be actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them...