From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Org-lint complains about valid footnote? Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:25:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87wp5rye2p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87wp5rzt7f.fsf@t3610> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlEbx-0007ui-Gc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:25:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlEbw-0003gq-MC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:25:21 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:40349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dlEbw-0003gW-GE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:25:20 -0400 Received: from saiph.selenimh (unknown [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::469]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CD441720AF for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:25:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ngz by saiph.selenimh with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dlEbu-0001rZ-Cx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:25:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wp5rzt7f.fsf@t3610> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:13:08 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Eric S Fraga writes: > In tracking down another problem with the latest version of org (more to > follow probably), I thought using org-lint might help. With the > attached simple example, I get: > > 5 high Missing definition for footnote [1] > > from org-lint. > > The footnote definition is there as it's inline... Fixed. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou