From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. " References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> <871seyp6fr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874lju6tap.fsf@bzg.fr> <87bme1y7ft.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8nrbclk.fsf@gmail.com> <87lgd2whh9.fsf@gmx.us> <87sh7a9e33.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fF105-00062e-Rm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:29:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fF102-0005qT-M3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:29:37 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=52714 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fF102-0005qH-GB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:29:34 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fF0xp-0008O0-4D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 19:27:17 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aaron Ecay writes: > Hi Rasmus, > > 2018ko maiatzak 2an, Rasmus Pank Roulund-ek idatzi zuen: >>> Finally, irrespective of which options are chosen, I think that org-tempo >>> would be better implemented in terms of a minor mode. This would allow >>> it to be autoloaded, turned on/off for different buffer(s) in an emacs >>> session, and avoid duplicating the logic for activating global minor >>> modes. Patch attached. >> >> I agree. > > OK, thatʼs good to know. Iʼve held off on any pushing of the patch to > master until everything is worked out. In the meantime, Iʼve put it in > a branch “org-tempo”. > > I also added a second commit to that branch which implements my vision > of the upgrade path (deprecation warnings, etc.) For convenience, that > patch is also attached to this email. I don’t like it, I’m afraid. It’s a bit nagging. There’s tools to mark thinks as obsolete in Emacs should we need to. > One remaining decision to make is: what is the future of org-tempo? I am > sympathetic to the idea that the best place for it eventually would be > org-contrib or GNU ELPA, and not org core. We don’t have make that decision now, do we? Rasmus -- This message is brought to you by the department of redundant departments