From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. " References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> <871seyp6fr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874lju6tap.fsf@bzg.fr> <87bme1y7ft.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8nrbclk.fsf@gmail.com> <87lgd2whh9.fsf@gmx.us> <87sh7a9e33.fsf@gmail.com> <87wowi8100.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFwUb-000426-4X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 02:52:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFwUa-000124-Cq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2018 02:52:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wowi8100.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sat, 05 May 2018 19:29:19 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > There=E2=80=99s tools to mark thinks as obsolete in Emacs should we need = to. One problem is that those tools (I'm thinking of define-obsolote-*) are more developer-oriented than user-oriented. E.g. AFAIK there is no "tool" to tell a user that a command accepts a new argument. Or is there? >> One remaining decision to make is: what is the future of org-tempo? I am >> sympathetic to the idea that the best place for it eventually would be >> org-contrib or GNU ELPA, and not org core. > > We don=E2=80=99t have make that decision now, do we? No. For now I'd like to get back to your original "trigger" and continue to enhance the org-tempo code so that it allows to wrap regions around templates. --=20 Bastien