From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org: Prevent loss of `re-search-forward' results
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:57:53 +0200
Message-ID: <87woe85gby.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <1054971006.20190829230306@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48798)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1i9uKH-0007kp-Qg
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:58:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1i9uKA-0006Nl-DP
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:58:09 -0400
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:45741)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
 id 1i9uK9-0006NE-Rd
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:58:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1054971006.20190829230306@gmail.com> (Max Mouratov's message of
 "Thu, 29 Aug 2019 23:03:06 +0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Max Mouratov <mmouratov@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Max Mouratov <mmouratov@gmail.com> writes:

> * org.el (org-activate-links): `match-beginning' and `match-end` should
> be called shortly after `re-search-forward'. Otherwise, they may return
> values corresponding to a different invocation of `re-search-forward'.

Applied. Thank you!

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou