From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: ob-prolog is sick. . . Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:35:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87wo8d63yz.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5nfj-0007lp-JU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 04:35:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Lawrence Bottorff's message of "Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:14:20 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Lawrence Bottorff Cc: emacs-orgmode Mailinglist Hi Lawrence, Lawrence Bottorff writes: > Besides the bad karma of listing a Babel language that actually > doesn't work, I would like to have Prolog working in Babel because I > get the sense Prolog's stock will slowly rise, mainly due to it being > the basis of querying graph databases. Prolog and RDF, basically. I didn't have time to look at ob-prolog.el either. If you know prolog: it is good opportunity to help the list understand how prolog block execution works: what is the prolog interpreter known by ob-prolog.el, how the interpreter is called when executing a block, what would be the notion of a "session" for prolog blocks, etc. If we know more about these points above, it will be easier and more fun to dive into ob-prolog.el to see what can go wrong. Thanks! -- Bastien