emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
To: Matt Huszagh <huszaghmatt@gmail.com>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix behavior of lambda default header arg vars
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:47:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wndnq5kw.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee03je2m.fsf@gmail.com>

Matt Huszagh <huszaghmatt@gmail.com> writes:

>> It would help if closure part and multi-variable part were split into
>> separate paragraphs.
>
> The closure part and muliple header argument part are already in
> separate paragraphs. The multiple header argument part, however, is
> incorporated into an introductory paragraph that very briefly describes
> the value syntax of org-babel-default-header-args and the types of alist
> values it supports. I did this because that introductory information is
> short and simple and so I felt it acceptable to incorporate the multiple
> header argument information. I don't feel this places a significant
> intellectual burden on the reader to follow, but I'm happy to insert a
> newline before "Some header arguments..." if you'd prefer.

Yes, please. And also move the multiple header arg parts below the
closure example.

>> Are you saying that _only some_ backends support multiple vars? Are
>> there backends that do not support?
>
> I think you're confused about "(e.g., :var for some language backends)":
>
> It's been a while since I created this patch and I don't remember
> exactly why I wrote it this way. I think it was based on the belief that
> not all language backends support variable passing in header arguments,
> though I honestly couldn't tell you at the moment whether this is
> true. In that vein, a semantically equivalent way to write this would be
> "(e.g., :var for language backends that support it)". Maybe all language
> backends support variable header arguments, in which case "(e.g., :var)"
> could be used here instead. In any case, the "some language backends"
> part of the phrase is not a qualification of "multiple", but of
> "variables". Nor is it correct to read it this way, as the statement is
> grammatically clear and correct. An equivalent statement would be:
>
> """
> Some header arguments can be provided multiple times for a source
> block. An example of such a header argument is :var.
> """

This looks slightly better. Though after reading your reply and
reviewing the docstring, I realize that my confusion partially came from
the fact that your patch is about closures, while the docstring change
is not.

Could you split that patch in two parts: one for the docstring change
and one for the :var parameter handling?

>> Also, the example is not helpful here.
>
> The example *is* helpful. It provides explicit direction for how to
> handle the non-obvious case of header arguments that can be passed
> multiple times, which isn't described much in the documentation.

Agree. See my above explanation about the source of confusion.

Best,
Ihor


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-11  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-27 14:57 [PATCH] Fix behavior of lambda default header arg vars Matt Huszagh
     [not found] ` <87y252bfr4.fsf@gmail.com>
2021-12-03  2:43   ` Matt Huszagh
2022-06-05 12:18 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-06-05 16:00   ` Matt Huszagh
2022-06-11  2:47     ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2022-06-28  3:53       ` Matt Huszagh
2022-06-29 10:02         ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-07-08 23:12           ` Matt Huszagh
2022-07-09  5:23             ` Ihor Radchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wndnq5kw.fsf@localhost \
    --to=yantar92@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=huszaghmatt@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).