Ilya Chernyshov <ichernyshovvv@gmail.com> writes:

> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> What about the attached amendment?
>> It should simplify things significantly.
>
> Sorry, in my previous patch the test that checks the detector itself was not
> even run in 'make test' because of incorrect test prefix.
>
> Your patch does not work as you expect. Could you please revise it?

Sure. I erroneously checked car of sub-form when testing whether to
ignore testing duplicates in children.

See the attached series of patches to be applied on top the previous 3.

Note that your
`test-org-tests/test-duplicates-detector-testing-find-duplicates' does
not look right. I had to adjust the `equal' condition in order to make
it pass. May you please check if the return value of
`test-duplicates-detector--find-duplicates' is what you intended?